PDA

View Full Version : Float idea


Ronald Bolivar Chua
9th August 2018, 22:02
Seemingly the most ecological...
I do think that an air pump buoy design would be the most efficient

Definitely not an engineer but

http://i936.photobucket.com/albums/ad208/goinginsane/EC5E3CA5-C244-45C2-8F91-A83B4C6DE428.jpeg (http://s936.photobucket.com/user/goinginsane/media/EC5E3CA5-C244-45C2-8F91-A83B4C6DE428.jpeg.html)

1)buoy pumps (air pumps)-base pumps air into segments air pressure is pumped
2)Segmented compression chambers- Air pressure is pumped into the segments and air pressure builds up overcoming each segment chamber
3)High Pressure turbine lock

Ronald Bolivar Chua
12th August 2018, 10:01
http://i936.photobucket.com/albums/ad208/goinginsane/2D06ADC3-E1A9-44E3-866E-B75C971D8233.jpeg (http://s936.photobucket.com/user/goinginsane/media/2D06ADC3-E1A9-44E3-866E-B75C971D8233.jpeg.html)

High compression and multiple buoy air pumps per compression chamber may give the current floats a run for their money. The original floats are wonderful in design, when I first saw them, I said to myself “We’re finally doing it.”. Just desired to look at the electricity generating mechanism...

Rob Beckers
13th August 2018, 15:10
Ronald, let's hold off on the ideas going forward. You're starting a new thread for each one, but at the end of the day these are over-unity machines that will never work. It's starting to become forum pollution.

Please have a look at "over unity" and "perpetual motion machines", Wikipedia has some good articles about them. Come back when you understand what that means from an energy-balance perspective, so you can analyze your own ideas. Saying "I'm not an engineer" is not good enough, and most other people just don't want to spend the time to follow along the rather convoluted schemes to find where things go wrong.

You seem sincere, and you make good looking drawings. At the end of the day these all fall in the mad-science category though, as well-intended as they are. If you're convinced they work, build one (or more), and show that to us (unfortunately I do not have much confidence any will work, there just is no such thing as free energy, it has to come from somewhere).

Cheers,

-RoB-

Ronald Bolivar Chua
13th August 2018, 22:35
Ronald, let's hold off on the ideas going forward. You're starting a new thread for each one, but at the end of the day these are over-unity machines that will never work. It's starting to become forum pollution.

Please have a look at "over unity" and "perpetual motion machines", Wikipedia has some good articles about them. Come back when you understand what that means from an energy-balance perspective, so you can analyze your own ideas. Saying "I'm not an engineer" is not good enough, and most other people just don't want to spend the time to follow along the rather convoluted schemes to find where things go wrong.

You seem sincere, and you make good looking drawings. At the end of the day these all fall in the mad-science category though, as well-intended as they are. If you're convinced they work, build one (or more), and show that to us (unfortunately I do not have much confidence any will work, there just is no such thing as free energy, it has to come from somewhere).

Cheers,

-RoB-

Okay, my apologies. Would I be able to transfer such ideas into the first forum topic that I have created? I will stop with such postings.