Log in

View Full Version : 5.7kW Rooftop MicroFIT Install


Rob Beckers
20th June 2010, 06:34
We're currently installing a 5.7 kW solar installation (for my business), going on a rooftop, for MicroFIT use. That means the home owners will get 80.2 cents for every kWh produced, for the next 20 years. There is some shading part of the year due to trees for this roof, and they are looking at a simple payback time just shy of 10 years. That means in 20 years (the contract term) they double the money that is invested, making for a 5% annual return-on-investment.

I thought it might be informative to post about a rooftop PV installation in some detail. It's not rocket science, though as always, the devil is in the details.

Much of the first day went to setting out where the rails are going, and finding the roof trusses. The tool of choice to locate trusses is a mallet; you can hear/feel it when you hit a truss by banging on the shingles. To find the actual center of the trusses I'm using a Bosch DTect-150 (http://www.bosch-pt.co.uk/boptocs2-uk/Product.jsp?country=GB&lang=en&division=gw&ccat_id=101302&object_id=23307), this is basically a super-stud-finder, that uses microwave to 'see through' surfaces. If works for any non-conducting material; concrete, wood, plastic, and sees up to 15 cm deep. I put a thin plastic sheet underneath, to have a smooth surface for the scanner to work on (it is actually a foldable cutting sheet purchased at a dollar shop). The Bosch scanner works like a charm! There are quite a few false echos, due to nails and such, but with a little work it does find the trusses and allows one to mark the exact center without having to drill test holes. The rail locations are marked with a chalk line, while I use lumber crayons (bright yellow chalk) to mark truss locations.

The norm for PV installations is to bolt an L-foot directly to the shingles. I believe that is a poor practice (tell a roofer you're going to drill 100+ holes in the roof and won't flash them, he'll declare you crazy!). Instead, I'm using a product called FlatJack (http://www.ttisolar.com/products/flatjack.html) that combines a foot with flashing, sealing off every roof penetration. They are not cheap, adding $15 for each roof attachment, but it will never leak. To make absolutely sure, we also caulk each hole with a tri-polymer based sealant, called Geocel 2300 (http://www.geocelusa.com/products/all-constructionbuilding-products.html?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage.tpl&product_id=46&category_id=1&keyword=2300). This is the latest and greatest in roof sealants, it's clear, lasts 50-years with UV exposure, and will stick to almost anything, including wet shingles.

Here is a picture of the FlatJack feet going on.

826

Each foot is held down by two stainless steel lag screws, we're using 1/4" x 3" screws, and the feet are spaced 48" (except for corner points, where wind uplift is highest). The feet of each row of PV modules alternate, so the load is spread over all trusses. This was all approved by a structural engineer, since Ottawa City requires stamped engineering drawings. We're actually putting in a few more feet than needed, for a variety of reasons.

Here is a FlatJack foot, they are made of stainless steel.

827

After adding the flashing part of a FlatJack, it looks like this.

828

We ran into one surprise along the way: The roof trusses did not extend all the way to the outside wall of the house. We ended up a truss short on both sides (the PV rails allow a 16" overhang). From the last truss the roof was build up from 2x4 lumber nailed perpendicular to that truss, extending out to the eave. One of the guys had the unfortunate task of going under the roof, and screwing pieces of 2x4 blocking between those rafter tails, to create a surface for another row of feet. You can see in the picture that we spaced the last two rows of feet just 24" apart, for that reason (in row is in a truss, the final row is in the blocking).
829

With the feet down, the rails are next. We are using Conergy's Suntop system (http://conergy.ca/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-3070/4341_read-7670/), which is relatively simple to put down. All the materials are aluminum and stainless steel. This is not cheap, but will look the same in 20 years as it does today. Believe it or not, but there is an outfit here in town that uses galvanized steel Unistrut (or an Ontario made version of it), yet they still charge $10 per installed Watt! While this is good for their bottom line (galvanized steel is cheap), they are definitely short-changing their customers.

The next picture shows the rails in place.

830

The last picture for this post has a close-up of an attachment point.

831

This is as far as we got last week, due to supply problems. The couplers that join two pieces of PV rail together were missing. They have since arrived, so we will finish up this install next week.

More to follow...

-RoB-

Ralph Day
21st June 2010, 05:43
That looks great Rob! And so quickly put up.

There are at least 10 microFIT's that I've seen in the County so far. I expect 40-50 before long. Within a 5km radius of mine are 5 others, my almost-in-laws are putting in 3...more money than corn on that farm.

I'll soon go through my pictures and thread my installation. Final inspection was last Thursday, 10 days to 2 weeks and we should be operational...then wait 3 months for the first payment

Ralph

Rob Beckers
21st June 2010, 18:56
Thanks Ralph!
Yup, lots of MicroFIT going in. I have another job next week as well. Almost 10kW on a residential rooftop using high-end (and very expensive) Sanyo modules.

To continue this particular saga....

Code requires that everything is grounded. Aluminum-on-aluminum contact does not work well, it tends to grow a skin of non-conducting aluminum oxide. The approved method is stainless steel fasteners and straps that connect the pieces of rail. Here is a picture.

832

Next step is to run the return wires for the strings, using MC4 extension cables. I don't have a picture of them, but you get the idea. Some of the PV panels were installed today as well. We're working from the middle outward (and upward), due to the dormer there. Before closing connectors we squeeze a little dielectric grease into them. That way water and oxygen will be kept away from the metal surfaces, and they should look the same if they are opened 40 years from now as they do today. That is the whole underlying philosophy; PV modules last at least 3 decades, probably more, so any material used should last at least as long.

837

The modules are grounded using WEEB clips (http://www.we-llc.com/WEEB.html), which go between each panel and the rail. They are made from stainless steel, and have little 'teeth' sticking out that bite into the panel and the rail. Canadian electrical code does not yet require this, the US code does. Only a matter of time before it does here too. Besides code, it is a good idea to ground modules properly. Not only for safety, but in case of lightning induced surges as well.

834

Also in that picture is a stainless steel tie-wrap. We're using stainless tie-wraps because the nylon ones, even the "UV resistant" ones, are only good for 5 or maybe 10 years. If you come back in 20 years you'd find half of them broken, and the other half disintegrating on contact. Stainless tie-wraps will look and function the same in 50 years as they do today. Of course, they are not cheap, but we're installing with a view of decades of functionality, not just until the warranty runs out (there are Tefzel tie-wraps that will last 50 years and are impervious to UV, however, they are 3x the price of stainless steel).

If you look really carefully you will see some regular black nylon ones being used as well. We tie cables temporarily to the rails with them, and leave them in place. If they break the stainless ones will simply hold everything together.

Not visible in the pictures are stainless cable clips that slide onto the bottom of the PV module frames. They are convenient, to hold the excess module leads. The idea is to keep cables from rubbing over the roof surface, since that will cause abrasion over time.

We did receive the missing rail couplers in, and installed those today. Here is a picture of one (if not a very good picture :confused:). The coupler goes on one side of the splice, the grounding strap on the other, and module clamp go on top.

835

To end with, and to show what the service of our business is all about, here is a picture of Chris cleaning the windows, eh, modules with Windex. :cool:

836

Actually, there is quite a bit of crud on the glass when the panels come out of the box, including something that looks like silicon glue here and there (it's not silicon though, since it comes right off when the panel gets hot in the sun). We like to give it the once-over while they are still easy to reach.

More to follow. Hopefully tomorrow the rest of the modules go on, and the grounding will be finalized. That is probably what we will leave it at for now. The home owner is still waiting for the conditional offer, and only after it comes in will we change the meter base and hook up the electrical part.

-RoB-

Rob Beckers
23rd June 2010, 08:08
The remaining modules were installed yesterday, and the wiring was brought down to the inverter. The inverter we are using is a 6kW Power-One Aurora (http://www.solacity.com/PowerOne.htm), and they have two independent inputs for PV. Those come in handy, since the bottom row of panels has shading issues due to high trees south of the house. The two top rows will get shaded too at certain times of the year, but it is much less of an issue for those. Just so the bottom row does not 'drag down' the performance of the other strings, it is connected to one input of the inverter. The two top rows are connected to the other input. Now both sections can do their own thing, and the inverter will run both at their maximum-power-point at all times.

The next picture shows the transition from PV modules to wiring towards the inverter. Liquid-tight conduit is used for the first section, because this is very flexible and can follow the contour of the roof's eave.

842

With the wiring done, it was a matter of putting down the last few modules, and cutting off the ends of the racking rails. I don't have a good picture of the whole roof, since even with a wide-angle lens I couldn't get far enough away. Besides, it started to rain just as we finished up (perfect timing! :nuts:). Here are a few impressions.

839

840

841

The home-owner is still over a month away from receiving a conditional offer from the OPA. So for now we can't hook up the second meter, and wiring has stopped at the inverter. Once the offer is in I will take a few more pictures and report back.

-RoB-

Dave Farrell
23rd June 2010, 20:41
Excellent looking job but just one comment if I may, I'd be concerned (as I believe the ESA will be as well) with the SS ty-raps cutting into the PV cabling.

Rob Beckers
24th June 2010, 05:50
Hi Dave,

It's a non-issue, at least for the tie-wraps we're using: They have rounded corners and the edges do not feel sharp at all. The other 'feature' of stainless tie-wraps is that you can't get them anywhere near as tight as nylon ones, because they have zero stretch. They hold the wire to the rails, but even when installed as tight and close to the rail as possible (the trick we found for that is to fold it around the corners of the rail before closing) it will still allow the wire to move around. There is no pressure on the wire. Finally, the wire used for PV has a jacket that is about twice the thickness of regular wire. It's tough stuff!

-Rob-

Rob Beckers
30th December 2010, 17:18
Going over this thread I realize there was a promise of adding the final bits, and I never did. So here goes.

We passed the building inspection without issue (Ottawa requires stamped engineered drawings and a building permit). This was funny; the inspector comes, and tells me "I have no idea what I should look for". I tried to explain the process a bit, point out a few things (flashing and such). It doesn't help that building inspectors are not allowed to climb scaffolding, so this all has to be done from the ground.

It took a very, very long time (8 weeks after submitting the paperwork if I count right) to get the approval from Hydro-One to hook up. They are slow, slow, slow. Changing out the existing meter base for a dual-meter base was more complicated for this job than usual. The meter base was recessed into the bricks. There wasn't enough space for a dual meter in there, so the new one sits in the front of the hole of the old meter. As usual the existing wire ends running to the meter from the transformer were too short to accommodate the change; we had to dig up the riser/conduit and were lucky to find a little coil there, so we had some slack. Hydro does not allow us to splice into the supply side wiring, it has to be continuous. Everything got hooked up, the electrical inspector came out, and this was nice, he commented he had never seen a PV installation this tidy! :cool:

The system has been running for a few months now. The home owner is happy, and it is on schedule to produce the predicted revenue. Here is a picture showing the whole array.

941

-RoB-

Chris Jacobson
3rd April 2011, 11:43
Hi Rob...as we are considering a 9.3kw project, it was nice to see your detailed log and photos for this installation.

In your introductory post you mentioned that the client had some seasonal shading issues. Could you elaborate on the amount and the impact on the generation as opposed to an similar unobstructed project?

Thanks in advance Rob.

Chris
Windsor, Ontario

Rob Beckers
3rd April 2011, 13:32
Hi Chris,

There are tall trees on the south side of this roof, in fact you can see I'm under the trees when I took that last picture. These are full-size elm and ash trees, as high as they will get. From October onward their shade starts hitting the bottom of the roof/panels. On the bright side, by late October the leaves are gone, and some sun gets through.

What I do is measure the roof left-middle-right, for the bottom-middle-top of the roof. So 9 locations in all. Then average the results of those locations for energy production. I use a Solmetric SunEye 210 tool to do this, it uses the sun paths and projected shadows to calculate the effect (using seasonal weather for the location as part of the mix). That is a lot more precise and easier than doing this by hand, though you can do it by measuring obstacles angles, and projecting that on a sun-chart (would take a great deal of time to do for many obstacles though!). In this case, the roof angle and orientation would result in 96% of an ideal roof (ideal is exactly south facing, and 37 degrees pitch) if there were no trees. With the trees it goes down to 90%. Still pretty good for a roof.

To add to that, for a roof with a pitch like this one (22 degrees), I normally discount energy production for December and half of January due to snow cover. Mix that with the shading calculations and you get a total estimated energy production for the year that should be pretty accurate (for an ideal roof I use 1140 kWh/kW/year as the starting value).

Since we know the bottom of the roof is most affected by shading we put the two MPPT inputs of the Power-One Aurora inverter to good use by splitting the array so the top half is on one input while the bottom half is on another (forgot the details and calculations; it could be we put the bottom 8 modules on one input, the other 2 rows on the other input). That will minimize the shading losses without having to resort to micro inverters (which are much more expensive, and add many more points of failure in a place where you don't want to go when one breaks).

Hopefully this explains the process a bit better!

-RoB-

Chris Jacobson
3rd April 2011, 13:46
Thanks for the quick reply Rob. I posted my first thread with a Sketchup photo of my situation. I posted before noon today but it has not come up on the forum yet. Did I do something wrong?

Thanks again

Chris

Rob Beckers
3rd April 2011, 16:09
Thanks for the quick reply Rob. I posted my first thread with a Sketchup photo of my situation. I posted before noon today but it has not come up on the forum yet. Did I do something wrong?

Thanks again

Chris

Sorry for the delay Chris! They ended up in the moderation queue, and I normally check that once a day. For the most part posts do not get moderated, but the forum runs anti-spam software in the background that checks all new posts against certain keywords, links in the post, and applies rules based on number of previous posts of the user etc. It then determines if the post should go through, or be send for moderation. While sometimes a nuisance, it cuts down 99.99% of all forum spam. Anyway, your post is up now (there were three of them actually, they looked identical so I deleted two).

-RoB-